RSS

Playstation Uses Story to Sell Resistance 3

Just saw a new commercial for Resistance 3, presumably produced by Playstation. I thought it was worth sharing because of the way Playstation has chosen to use the game’s story and attempt to appeal to people’s sympathy for the apparent protagonist in order to engage consumers.

Do you feel more inclined to purchase a game when you feel that there’s a story worth getting into?

Advertisements
 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 10, 2011 in Miscellaneous Thoughts

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Midterm Project: Kingdom Come

Just over a week ago I posted my midterm project for the University of Waterloo’s English 794 “Video Game Theory” course. It’s a video game concept that brings together the best of three popular video games (World of Warcraft, Age of Empires and the MMO Utopia), theory from the course and a variety of digital media.

If you haven’t already seen it, you can check out my project by clicking this link or by using the links found in the right-hand navigation column.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 24, 2011 in Projects

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Fast Food Fighter

A great idea for a video game. I wonder if the fast food chains this characters represent would be into this. Probably not…

Source: http://theuniblog.wordpress.com/2008/11/14/wendy-vs-ronald-m-fight/

 
1 Comment

Posted by on August 13, 2011 in Miscellaneous Thoughts

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Major Project Preview: World of Warcraft Overview

The following is an excerpt from my upcoming ENGL 794 major project, where I will be comparing World of Warcraft, Age of Empires and Utopia in order to create a game concept of my own. Specifically, this is an in-depth overview of World of Warcraft, which will be pared down significantly for my final project.

Exploration

Exploration in World of Warcraft is as basic a concept as you can get with a first-person (or third-person, which you can experience in WoW) role playing game. Gamers simply wander around the vast virtual world looking for avatars who can offer them quests, and ultimately a reward. Getting from point A to B is tedious, and while finding new territory is interesting it is only useful by way of offering more quests and more enemies with whom players may interact.

The world is beautifully rendered, however, and seeing the various, diverse land is a treat. In this regard, exploration is a pure instance of discovery that brings inherent pleasure. Much like the feelings that Europeans must have experienced as they discovered new plants and animals in the New World, gamers can feel excitement and surprise when they run into an odd creature or a breathtaking view.

Development/Avatar

Because game progression in WoW revolves around the avatar—the personalized, computer-generated virtual creature that gamers of WoW control in order to move through the game—I have decided to combine my critique of development and avatars here. Michael Heim has described avatars in a way that I think works very well in the context of online role playing games like WoW: “shared fantasy identities that prove [gamers] are alive and telepresent through real-time playful interactive construction. Avatar identities are finite points of presence, intrinsically interactive and plural, embedded in communities of other avatars” (in Flanagan 68). Meanwhile, Mary Flanagan argues that avatars are “an other (perhaps a soft other), with whom we develop a relationship” (68). The difference between these two definitions is that Heim sees avatars as a virtual representation, or stand-in, of a real person, while Flanagan sees avatars as a kind of remote-controlled robot. I think either definition can work in WoW depending on how players choose to use their avatar. For me, I designed my avatar after myself and added accessories and weapons that spoke to me personally (for more on my experience creating a WoW avatar, click here). However, gamers may choose to create an avatar that is completely different from themselves, as seen in this clip from the television show How I Met Your Mother:

Gamers may also treat their avatars as a subservient “other” by putting their avatars into situations they would never go themselves. For instance, gamers may find enjoyment from casting their avatar off cliffs, feeding it to wolves, using it as bait to help others, etc. For me, I avoided these situations as I had invested myself into my avatar as an extension of myself, and used it to interact with others as I would interact with others in person (within the boundaries provided by the game).

At any rate, the avatar is an extremely important component of WoW, and indeed the entire game is played in order to make your avatar as powerful as possible. Quests are completed in order to obtain accessories—or in-game currency that is used to buy accessories—for your avatar, and experience points, which help increase certain powers and abilities. Gamers do not own any land in WoW, but rather only what their avatar can carry on their virtual person.

The development of one’s avatar seems to be enough to keep most WoW players interested (even obsessively hooked), and the progressive points-as-reward system is simple and effective. But, as one game reviewer has pointed out, “the grind” of exploration and avatar development can be a bit much:

…let’s talk about The Grind. In a traditional persistent online RPG, you advance your character by killing an endless string of monsters, and by doing “FedEx” quests where you get some money and/or experience points by delivering an arbitrary item from Point A to Point B. As your character advances, his or her progress begins to slow. It takes longer and longer to get to the next level, because you need more and more experience points each time, yet the experience returned from monsters and deliveries does not scale accordingly. Yet you feel compelled to continue because at Level X you get a really cool spell or other ability that’s supposed to make the game more “fun.” (McNamara)

Avatar development in WoW is a trap, and an effective trap indeed.

Combat

The combat in WoW is bulky, slow and unappealing. Essentially, players can engage a single target at a time (at least early on, in my experience), and fire different spells or attacks in timed intervals. What this leads to is an almost turn-based combat system (think Pokemon or even “go-fish”) where two avatars give and receive hits until one runs out of defensive stamina. After playing games with phenomenal hand-to-hand combat (Arkham Asylum comes to mind), the battles in WoW just don’t impress. I realize swordplay, magic, gunfighting and the like are difficult to combine, but there has to be a more natural way to make it all come together. Aside from the flashes of mystical lightning, swinging of hands/swords or the bursts of fire from the barrel of a blunderbuss, combat in WoW is pretty lame.

Here’s a sample PvP (player-vs-player) battle (the addition of “Sandstorm” energizes things significantly):

Interface and Controls

As you can see from the screenshot above, the interface in WoW can get pretty complicated. Along the bottom you have your inventory of spells, objects and weapons; in the top-right corner you have a map and different options for navigating the game-world; along the top are health meters for you and your enemies; and to the left are other human-controlled avatars with whom you may interact. I have to say that I became lost in this mess more than once, and never really got to understand all of the features that were available to me.

In terms of controls, WoW requires a keyboard and mouse (it’s played on a computer, after all), which became overwhelming to me as well, since I have in recent years become a console gamer exclusively. I am told that you can get used to finding the proper buttons to hit on a keyboard and that the game can be manipulated rather smoothly, but there are a lot of keys on a keyboard, aren’t there? And figuring out which keys do what, and in which situation, became a nightmare for me.*

*Again, I admit that I only played this game for a couple of weeks and my experience is extremely limited. But this was my initial impression.

Cinematics

The most incredible part of WoW for me is how detailed and diverse the developers have made this massive virtual world. Every village and city has its own look and feel and the land is covered in prairies, mountains, lakes, forests, deserts, and all kinds of geographical variation to keep things fresh and to help players remember where certain items or individuals are located.

The computer graphics may be somewhat polygonal and dated, and lack a realistic edginess that some gamers may prefer. But I found the stylized characters and buildings appealing and, more importantly, consistent throughout the game. Without much knowledge about the kind of computing power it takes to run such a game, I suspect the developers at Blizzard were forced to make certain concessions when it came to graphic design in order to have the game play smoothly online, which it did for me (at the university—not at home).

The opening cut scene for World of Warcraft: Cataclysm (which is the updated version that I experienced) is a pretty cool video, and certainly one that should get players excited to get into the game and start playing. Unfortunately, I did not run into any further cut scenes like this in my two weeks of gameplay (maybe there are more later on?…) and the loading images that I did see were standard images that seemed to come straight off of the box the game comes in.

Finally, the sound in WoW is bland, ineffective and sparse. Eventually I ended up muting the game in favour of my personal library of music. All narrative elements that are offered to gamers through meeting characters and completing quests are written in pop-up boxes—nothing is voiced. Occasionally you will hear a grunt, roar or squeal from a nearby character, and attacks/spells are accompanied by appropriate booms and clangs. But I certainly never encountered music or sound that aided in submersing me deeper into the game.

Overall Appeal

Obviously, what I lacked in my two week trial of World of Warcraft was the “massively multiplayer” element. I think WoW could be a really fun game if I had a bunch of friends who I could meet up with online and annihilate other groups of people, and certainly that seems to be the appeal for hardcore gamers of WoW (as depicted in the online series The Guild):

However, from the perspective of a single player looking to have fun independently with others, WoW is a vast space that takes far too long to explore, and the individual quests do not come together to form a cohesive narrative. Instead, I found myself bouncing back and forth from one spot to another trying to gain experience points and accessories for my avatar, until I eventually found the game too time consuming to continue, and I haven’t been lured back (despite the fact that WoW can now be played for free up until you reach level 20).

WoW is a fun game to try out, and certainly a marvel in terms of environment design. But there are only a few elements that I would like to take from the game and incorporate into my own.

Works Cited

Flanagan, Mary and Austin Booth. Re:skin. Cambridge, MA: MIT P, 2002.

McNamara, Tom. “World of Warcraft Review.” IGN. 10 Dec. 2004. Web. 1 Aug. 2011 <http://pc.ign.com/articles/572/572070p1.html&gt;.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 8, 2011 in RPG

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Stating the Obvious

I’m not sure what game this is from. Safe money’s on something related to James Bond.

Credit for this goes to my buddy Tyler, who had it on his Facebook page.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 7, 2011 in Miscellaneous Thoughts

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Tetris Backstory

I saw this on Lars Konzack’s blog today and thought it was worth sharing. Goes to show that any game, no matter how trivial, can be made a little more complex (and interesting) with a bit of narrative to give it context.

Source: http://konzack.blogspot.com/2011_05_01_archive.html

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on August 6, 2011 in Miscellaneous Thoughts

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Arkham City Update: The Penguin

I’ve never been a huge fan of the Penguin, as his awkward deformations and obsession with birds has always seemed a bit corny to me. (Danny DeVito’s Penguin would be the epitome of that corniness.) But I like the direction Rocksteady is taking the Penguin—further exaggerating his pompous, greedy ways and making him more of a brainy, bourgeois-shackling kingpin. After all, the Penguin has always been a power player through Batman lore and very few Gotham City criminals have a simple, tangible motive (such as wealth) to push them over the edge.

Plus the first looks of the Penguin look pretty cool—he actually looks quite frightening, as opposed to the umbrella-wielding fatty we’ve grown used to seeing. He’s still got an umbrella. But other cool things, too… like a grenade-launcher.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on July 24, 2011 in Miscellaneous Thoughts

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

 
%d bloggers like this: